These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 149719)

  • 1. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [First results of mammography with a screen film (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Strahlentherapie; 1979 Jan; 155(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 760273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    Evers R; Römer M
    Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
    Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dose reduction in xeromammography (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K; Kurz E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1978 May; 103(20):859-61. PubMed ID: 648366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of different systems of mammography records with regard to their exposure to radiation and their information content (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K; Kurz E; Teske HJ
    Strahlentherapie; 1978 Feb; 154(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 628932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques.
    Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE
    Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Breast xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    Gros CM; Prévot G
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(6-7):471-80. PubMed ID: 1177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic significance of high-filtration xeromammography in relation to radiation hazard and image quality (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 675061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.