These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 149720)

  • 21. [Picture quality and film mammography. I. The physical parameters of the filming system (gradation, sensitivity, definition and granularity) and the effect of exposure geometry (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Sep; 125(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 134958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
    Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dose reduction in xeromammography (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K; Kurz E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1978 May; 103(20):859-61. PubMed ID: 648366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
    Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F; Smathers RL
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Criteria for the choice of intensifying screen-film combination (author's transl)].
    Tosi G; Borasi G
    Radiol Med; 1978 Oct; 64(10):1105-12. PubMed ID: 734174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The XERG-mammography system: a solution to the dose-quality problem?
    Friedrich M
    Eur J Radiol; 1981 May; 1(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 7338239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.