341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14972397)
1. Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification.
Collewet G; Strzelecki M; Mariette F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 22(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 14972397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: Transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher MJ; Kramer J; Aigner N; Hofmann S; Materka A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 16215966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of rat muscles during atrophy and regeneration.
Mahmoud-Ghoneim D; Cherel Y; Lemaire L; de Certaines JD; Maniere A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 24(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16455405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Texture analysis for automatic segmentation of intervertebral disks of scoliotic spines from MR images.
Chevrefils C; Cheriet F; Aubin CE; Grimard G
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 19369169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of age and osteoporosis on calcaneus trabecular bone structure: a preliminary in vivo MRI study by quantitative texture analysis.
Herlidou S; Grebe R; Grados F; Leuyer N; Fardellone P; Meyer ME
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 22(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 15010116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.
Chao WH; Chen YY; Lin SH; Shih YY; Tsang S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 19097854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: an application-oriented study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Materka A; Trattnig S
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19472631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wavelet-based characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from magnetic resonance images at 3 T compared with micro-computed tomographic measurements.
Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Burghardt AJ; Haase S; Sedat JW; Moss WC; Majumdar S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 17371730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multispectral magnetic resonance image analysis.
Vannier MW; Butterfield RL; Rickman DL; Jordan DM; Murphy WA; Biondetti PR
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1987; 15(2):117-44. PubMed ID: 3691157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Texture analysis and classification with linear regression model based on wavelet transform.
Wang ZZ; Yong JH
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1421-30. PubMed ID: 18632350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equilibrium signal intensity mapping, an MRI method for fast mapping of longitudinal relaxation rates and for image enhancement.
Surányi P; Kiss P; Ruzsics B; Brott BC; Simor T; Elgavish GA
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 17540275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential diagnosis of CT focal liver lesions using texture features, feature selection and ensemble driven classifiers.
Mougiakakou SG; Valavanis IK; Nikita A; Nikita KS
Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17624744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional texture analysis of MRI brain datasets.
Kovalev VA; Kruggel F; Gertz HJ; von Cramon DY
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 May; 20(5):424-33. PubMed ID: 11403201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of anatomical structures in MR brain images using fuzzy parameters.
Algorri ME; Flores-Mangas F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1599-608. PubMed ID: 15376508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synthetic T1-weighted brain image generation with incorporated coil intensity correction using DESPOT1.
Deoni SC; Rutt BK; Peters TM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 17071345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
