156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14972598)
1. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.
Band GP; van der Molen MW; Overtoom CC; Verbaten MN
J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Apr; 75(4):263-90. PubMed ID: 10698613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.
Hale S
Child Dev; 1990 Jun; 61(3):653-63. PubMed ID: 2364741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Bekker EM; Overtoom CC; Kooij JJ; Buitelaar JK; Verbaten MN; Kenemans JL
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 62(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 16203958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
Verbruggen F; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motor response inhibition and execution in the stop-signal task: development and relation to ADHD behaviors.
Tillman CM; Thorell LB; Brocki KC; Bohlin G
Child Neuropsychol; 2008 Jan; 14(1):42-59. PubMed ID: 17852128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling.
Kray J; Kipp KH; Karbach J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19084817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm.
van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):253-66. PubMed ID: 15518939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 15111228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Switching between tasks and responses: a developmental study.
Crone EA; Bunge SA; van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR
Dev Sci; 2006 May; 9(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 16669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
