These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1497271)

  • 1. Comparison of speech recognition ability with different speech processing strategies by Korean cochlear implantees.
    Kim HN; Shim YJ; Kim YM; Cho GJ; Moon SK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1992 Aug; 101(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 1497271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2 and F0F1F2B3B4B5 speech processing strategies.
    Parkinson AJ; Tyler RS; Woodworth GG; Lowder MW; Gantz BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8729916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 116(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative speech recognition results in eight subjects using two different coding strategies with the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant.
    von Wallenberg EL; Battmer RD
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Dec; 25(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 1773197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Battmer RD; Döring WH; Müller-Deile J
    Audiology; 1995; 34(3):145-59. PubMed ID: 8561692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):443-60. PubMed ID: 10613383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comb-filtered speech as a tool to demonstrate difficulties of speech perception and the importance of auditory training in cochlear implant users.
    Petrov SM; Pisareva NY
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21756459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA; Holden LK; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indication of a relation between speech perception and temporal resolution for cochlear implantees.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Kasper A; Montandon P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):893-5. PubMed ID: 1746822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of Dutch phonemes by cochlear implant users with the Multipeak strategy.
    van Olphen AF; van Dijk JE; Langereis MC; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():365-8. PubMed ID: 7668709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Prelingually Deafened Children According to Molecular Genetic Etiology.
    Park JH; Kim AR; Han JH; Kim SD; Kim SH; Koo JW; Oh SH; Choi BY
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e316-e324. PubMed ID: 28841141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).
    Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfennigdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner W; Gstöttner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 8797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.