131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14973100)
1. No difference in response rate to a mailed survey among prostate cancer survivors using conditional versus unconditional incentives.
Evans BR; Peterson BL; Demark-Wahnefried W
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Feb; 13(2):277-8. PubMed ID: 14973100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.
Rosoff PM; Werner C; Clipp EC; Guill AB; Bonner M; Demark-Wahnefried W
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1330-2. PubMed ID: 15894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a gift certificate incentive and specialized delivery on prostate cancer survivors' response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized-controlled trial.
Bakan J; Chen B; Medeiros-Nancarrow C; Hu JC; Kantoff PW; Recklitis CJ
J Geriatr Oncol; 2014 Apr; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24495697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unconditional and conditional incentives differentially improved general practitioners' participation in an online survey: randomized controlled trial.
Young JM; O'Halloran A; McAulay C; Pirotta M; Forsdike K; Stacey I; Currow D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):693-7. PubMed ID: 25450450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of different unconditional monetary incentives on survey response rates in men with prostate cancer: a 2-arm randomised trial.
McIntosh M; Opozda MJ; O'Callaghan M; Vincent AD; Galvão DA; Short CE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):252. PubMed ID: 36175831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized control trial of unconditional versus conditional incentives to increase study enrollment rates in participants at increased risk of lung cancer.
Kumar AD; Durham DD; Lane L; Perera P; Rivera MP; Henderson LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():11-17. PubMed ID: 34469801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unconditional and conditional monetary incentives to increase response to mailed questionnaires: A randomized controlled study within a trial (SWAT).
Young B; Bedford L; das Nair R; Gallant S; Littleford R; Robertson JFR; Schembri S; Sullivan FM; Vedhara K; Kendrick D;
J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 26(3):893-902. PubMed ID: 31328399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of survey incentive methods to recruit rural cancer survivors into cancer care delivery research studies.
Falk D; Tooze JA; Winkfield KM; Bell RA; Morris B; Strom C; Copus E; Shore K; Weaver KE
Cancer Causes Control; 2022 Nov; 33(11):1381-1386. PubMed ID: 35986825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining conditional and unconditional recruitment incentives could facilitate telephone tracing in surveys of postpartum women.
Beydoun H; Saftlas AF; Harland K; Triche E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):732-8. PubMed ID: 16765277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.
Wiant K; Geisen E; Creel D; Willis G; Freedman A; de Moor J; Klabunde C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 30305049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?
Escudero JN; Tiro JA; Buist DSM; Gao H; Beatty T; Lin J; Miglioretti DL; Winer RL
Connect Health Telemed; 2023; 2(3):. PubMed ID: 37641713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
Robb KA; Gatting L; Wardle J
Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):671-685. PubMed ID: 28422369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals.
Ulrich CM; Danis M; Koziol D; Garrett-Mayer E; Hubbard R; Grady C
Nurs Res; 2005; 54(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 15897793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.
Delnevo CD; Abatemarco DJ; Steinberg MB
Am J Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 26(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 15026104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates.
Keating NL; Zaslavsky AM; Goldstein J; West DW; Ayanian JZ
Med Care; 2008 Aug; 46(8):878-81. PubMed ID: 18665068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.
Halpern SD; Ubel PA; Berlin JA; Asch DA
Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9):834-9. PubMed ID: 12218773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An experimental test of the effect of incentives on recruitment of ethnically diverse colorectal cancer cases and their first-degree relatives into a research study.
Maxwell AE; Bastani R; Glenn BA; Mojica CM; Chang LC
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2620-5. PubMed ID: 19755646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.
Whiteman MK; Langenberg P; Kjerulff K; McCarter R; Flaws JA
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):821-8. PubMed ID: 14588132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of incentives in vulnerable populations for a telephone survey: a randomized controlled trial.
Knoll M; Soller L; Ben-Shoshan M; Harrington D; Fragapane J; Joseph L; La Vieille S; St-Pierre Y; Wilson K; Elliott S; Clarke A
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Oct; 5():572. PubMed ID: 23083313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey.
Gajic A; Cameron D; Hurley J
Eur J Health Econ; 2012 Dec; 13(6):789-99. PubMed ID: 21691841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
