These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14974103)

  • 1. Effects of an alternate dissection schedule on gross anatomy laboratory practical performance.
    McWhorter DL; Forester JP
    Clin Anat; 2004 Mar; 17(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 14974103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of four supplemental instruction programs on students' learning of gross anatomy.
    Forester JP; Thomas PP; McWhorter DL
    Clin Anat; 2004 May; 17(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15108338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.
    Johnson JH
    Clin Anat; 2002 Jan; 15(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11835543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory.
    Brueckner JK; MacPherson BR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 May; 8(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 15059083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change.
    Patel KM; Moxham BJ
    Clin Anat; 2006 Mar; 19(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16302246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform.
    Peterson CA; Tucker RP
    Clin Anat; 2005 Oct; 18(7):540-7. PubMed ID: 16015636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections.
    Nnodim JO; Ohanaka EC; Osuji CU
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 8793221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
    Larkin TA; McAndrew DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Krych AJ; March CN; Bryan RE; Peake BJ; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW
    Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 15832347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in anatomy instruction and USMLE performance: empirical evidence on the absence of a relationship.
    Cuddy MM; Swanson DB; Drake RL; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 23297159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores.
    Mahmud W; Hyder O; Butt J; Aftab A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21265032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum in India: medical student feedback on duration and emphasis of gross anatomy teaching.
    Holla SJ; Ramachandran K; Isaac B; Koshy S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 19434688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Back to basics.
    Leong SK
    Clin Anat; 1999; 12(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 10545858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved dissection efficiency in the human gross anatomy laboratory by the integration of computers and modern technology.
    Reeves RE; Aschenbrenner JE; Wordinger RJ; Roque RS; Sheedlo HJ
    Clin Anat; 2004 May; 17(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 15108341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection.
    Yeager VL
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8838283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gross anatomy: an outdated subject or an essential part of a modern medical curriculum? Results of a questionnaire circulated to final-year medical students.
    Pabst R
    Anat Rec; 1993 Nov; 237(3):431-3. PubMed ID: 8291697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance in a prematriculation gross anatomy course as a predictor of performance in medical school.
    Tucker RP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 19177416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.
    Bentley BS; Hill RV
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 19637291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.