316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14974805)
1. Sex offender registration and community notification challenges: the Supreme Court continues its trend.
Scott CL; Gerbasi JB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 14974805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Castration of sex offenders: prisoners' rights versus public safety.
Scott CL; Holmberg T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 14974806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Policy interventions designed to combat sexual violence: community notification and civil commitment.
Levenson JS
J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):17-52. PubMed ID: 15308446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders.
Schiavone SK; Jeglic EL
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):679-95. PubMed ID: 18728128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inevitable recidivism--the origin and centrality of an urban legend.
Lave TR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 21596438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kansas v. Hendricks.
Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex offender reentry courts: a cost effective proposal for managing sex offender risk in the community.
La Fond JQ; Winick BJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():300-23; discussion 352-9. PubMed ID: 12839907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: a quantitative review of the research literature.
Lasher MP; McGrath RJ
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 21123209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospects for the international migration of U.S. sex offender registration and community notification laws.
Logan WA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 21550661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexually violent predators and civil commitment laws.
Kendall WD; Cheung M
J Child Sex Abus; 2004; 13(2):41-57. PubMed ID: 15388411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex offender management: the public policy challenges.
Robinson LO
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():1-7. PubMed ID: 12839882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic and risk profiles of men detained under Wisconsin's sexually violent person law.
Elwood RW; Doren DM; Thornton D
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 19056858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misperceptions of sex offender perpetration: considering the impact of sex offender registration.
Craun SW; Theriot MT
J Interpers Violence; 2009 Dec; 24(12):2057-72. PubMed ID: 19074256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feel good legislation: prevention or calamity.
Freeman-Longo RE
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Feb; 20(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 8838406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
Elwood RW
Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
Douard J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The exclusion-inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions.
Petrunik M; Deutschmann L
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):499-519. PubMed ID: 17991905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Juvenile female and male sex offenders: a comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics.
Vandiver DM; Teske R
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Apr; 50(2):148-65. PubMed ID: 16510886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
