These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14975974)

  • 1. Mammographic breast glandularity in Malaysian women: data derived from radiography.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D; Looi LM; Moosa F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 14975974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
    Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
    Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
    Geise RA; Palchevsky A
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
    Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D phantom for image quality assessment of mammography systems.
    Bermúdez J; Roque G; Calderón J; Pardo P; Sánchez M; Ramos V; Ávila C
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37733054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of equivalent breast phantoms for different age groups of Taiwanese women: an experimental approach.
    Dong SL; Chu TC; Lin YC; Lan GY; Yeh YH; Chen S; Chuanga KS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4094-100. PubMed ID: 21859009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography.
    Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):801-13. PubMed ID: 10730972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reduction in automatic optimization parameter of full field digital mammography: breast phantom study.
    Ko MS; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim JH; Kim MJ
    J Breast Cancer; 2013 Mar; 16(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative growth of Malay, Chinese and Indian school children in Malaysia.
    Chen ST
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1976 Sep; 7(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 1030848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of Tube Output (kVp) and Exposure Mode for Breast Phantom of Various Thicknesses/Glandularity for Digital Mammography.
    Izdihar K; Kanaga KC; Krishnapillai V; Sulaiman T
    Malays J Med Sci; 2015; 22(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 25892949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doses in mammography: from the phantom to the patient.
    Cross P
    Australas Radiol; 1994 Feb; 38(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia.
    Pong SL
    Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(3):137-48. PubMed ID: 7940619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast.
    Skubic SE; Fatouros PP
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 2770628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STATISTICAL MODELING OF GLANDULARITY FROM MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGES.
    Castrillón CO; Puerta JA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Dec; 197(3-4):237-244. PubMed ID: 34994783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.