These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14976905)

  • 1. Guidelines for appraisal and publication of PDSA quality improvement.
    Speroff T; James BC; Nelson EC; Headrick LA; Brommels M
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2004; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 14976905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research.
    Speroff T; O'Connor GT
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2004; 13(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 14976904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The PDSA cycle at the core of learning in health professions education.
    Cleghorn GD; Headrick LA
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1996 Mar; 22(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 8664953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can quality improvement improve the quality of care? A systematic review of reported effects and methodological rigor in plan-do-study-act projects.
    Knudsen SV; Laursen HVB; Johnsen SP; Bartels PD; Ehlers LH; Mainz J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Oct; 19(1):683. PubMed ID: 31585540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.
    Taylor MJ; McNicholas C; Nicolay C; Darzi A; Bell D; Reed JE
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Apr; 23(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 24025320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ISO 9000: a guide to world-class quality standards.
    Tambolas SF
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1996 Feb; 18(3):62-8. PubMed ID: 10165240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Running PDSA cycles.
    Christoff P
    Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care; 2018 Aug; 48(8):198-201. PubMed ID: 30270135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
    Gordon DB; Pellino TA; Miaskowski C; McNeill JA; Paice JA; Laferriere D; Bookbinder M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2002 Dec; 3(4):116-30. PubMed ID: 12454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Critical appraisal of articles about clinical audit].
    Mogyorósy Z; Mogyorósy G
    Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(21):985-91. PubMed ID: 17513252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating guidelines with continuous quality improvement: doing the right thing the right way to achieve the right goals.
    Kibbe DC; Kaluzny AD; McLaughlin CP
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1994 Apr; 20(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 8055074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological rigor and reporting of clinical practice guidelines in patients with allergic rhinitis: QuGAR study.
    Padjas A; Kehar R; Aleem S; Mejza F; Bousquet J; Schünemann HJ; Brożek JL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2014 Mar; 133(3):777-83.e4. PubMed ID: 24139606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Science of Quality Improvement.
    Girdler SJ; Glezos CD; Link TM; Sharan A
    JBJS Rev; 2016 Aug; 4(8):. PubMed ID: 27603270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Good measurement for good improvement work.
    Nelson EC; Splaine ME; Plume SK; Batalden P
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2004; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 14976903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.