These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14977029)

  • 1. Time-pressure effects on performance in a base-rate task.
    Goodie AS; Crooks CL
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 14977029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.
    Fantino E; Kanevsky IG; Charlton SR
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):820-5. PubMed ID: 16181446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice strategies in multiple-cue probability learning.
    White CM; Koehler DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):757-68. PubMed ID: 17576152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use.
    Pachur T; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both?
    Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample.
    Goodie AS; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 10220928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
    Pleskac TJ; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):864-901. PubMed ID: 20658856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
    Hogarth RM; Karelaia N
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making.
    Pachur T; Olsson H
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Sep; 65(2):207-40. PubMed ID: 22575684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game.
    Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.
    Glöckner A; Betsch T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making.
    Richter T; Späth P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 16478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.
    Rieskamp J; Hoffrage U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 17640605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations.
    De Neys W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1070-100. PubMed ID: 16885144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.
    Chica AB; Christie J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.