352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14977345)
1. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.
Marx G; Cope T; McCrossan L; Swaraj S; Cowan C; Mostafa SM; Wenstone R; Leuwer M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 14977345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients.
Wiesenack C; Fiegl C; Keyser A; Prasser C; Keyl C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):658-65. PubMed ID: 16163911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery.
Reuter DA; Felbinger TW; Schmidt C; Kilger E; Goedje O; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Intensive Care Med; 2002 Apr; 28(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 11967591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.
Reuter DA; Bayerlein J; Goepfert MS; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Mar; 29(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 12579420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.
Tavernier B; Makhotine O; Lebuffe G; Dupont J; Scherpereel P
Anesthesiology; 1998 Dec; 89(6):1313-21. PubMed ID: 9856704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial performance index during rapidly changing loading conditions: impact of different tidal ventilation.
Renner J; Cavus E; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Lutter G; Steffen M; Bein B
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18028576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.
Préau S; Saulnier F; Dewavrin F; Durocher A; Chagnon JL
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery.
Berkenstadt H; Margalit N; Hadani M; Friedman Z; Segal E; Villa Y; Perel A
Anesth Analg; 2001 Apr; 92(4):984-9. PubMed ID: 11273937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.
Michard F; Alaya S; Zarka V; Bahloul M; Richard C; Teboul JL
Chest; 2003 Nov; 124(5):1900-8. PubMed ID: 14605066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function.
Trof RJ; Danad I; Reilingh MW; Breukers RM; Groeneveld AB
Crit Care; 2011; 15(1):R73. PubMed ID: 21352541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.
Kumar A; Anel R; Bunnell E; Habet K; Zanotti S; Marshall S; Neumann A; Ali A; Cheang M; Kavinsky C; Parrillo JE
Crit Care Med; 2004 Mar; 32(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 15090949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
