168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14978940)
1. [Location of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens].
Sakamoto N; Kagawa Y; Tanaka S; Iguchi A; Hasegawa Y; Koga H; Naito S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 95(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 14978940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do robotic prostatectomy positive surgical margins occur in the same location as extraprostatic extension?
Johnson MT; Ramsey ML; Ebel JJ; Abaza R; Zynger DL
World J Urol; 2014 Jun; 32(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 24096432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Location of a positive biopsy as a predictor of surgical margin status and extraprostatic disease in radical prostatectomy.
Touma NJ; Chin JL; Bella T; Sener A; Izawa JI
BJU Int; 2006 Feb; 97(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 16430624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.
Kang YJ; Abalajon MJ; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158922. PubMed ID: 27391650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical significance of in-depth pathological assessment of extraprostatic extension and margin status in radical prostatectomies for prostate cancer.
Chan SM; Garcia FJ; Chin JL; Moussa M; Gabril MY
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2011 Dec; 14(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 21502968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rosen MA; Goldstone L; Lapin S; Wheeler T; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1992 Aug; 148(2 Pt 1):331-7. PubMed ID: 1635129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of focal and diffuse extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins on biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy.
Billis A; Meirelles LL; Freitas LL; Magna LA; Reis LO; Ferreira U
Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22555042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Clinical Impact of pT3a Lesions in Patients With pT3b Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Numbere N; Teramoto Y; Gurung PMS; Goto T; Yang Z; Miyamoto H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 May; 146(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 34979562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The radial distance of extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma: implications for prostate brachytherapy.
Davis BJ; Pisansky TM; Wilson TM; Rothenberg HJ; Pacelli A; Hillman DW; Sargent DJ; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 85(12):2630-7. PubMed ID: 10375112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A side-specific nomogram for extraprostatic extension may reduce the positive surgical margin rate in radical prostatectomy.
Heetman JG; Soeterik TFW; Wever L; Meyer AR; Nuininga JE; van Soest RJ; van Melick HHE; van Basten JPA; van den Bergh RCN
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2919-2924. PubMed ID: 36344738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-operative prostate examination: predictive value and effect on margin status.
Rapp DE; Orvieto MA; Lucioni A; Gong EM; Shalhav AL; Brendler CB
BJU Int; 2005 Nov; 96(7):1005-8. PubMed ID: 16225517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.
Cheng L; Darson MF; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Myers RP; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 10547551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discordance between location of positive cores in biopsy and location of positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy.
Kim JW; Park HK; Kim HG; Ham DY; Paick SH; Lho YS; Choi WS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):710-6. PubMed ID: 26495072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinicopathological analysis of transition zone cancer of the prostate: the clinical significance of coexistent non-transition zone cancer foci].
Sakamoto N; Hasegawa Y; Kuroiwa K; Koga H; Kotoh S; Nakashima M; Naito S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Aug; 90(8):718-23. PubMed ID: 10487048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic positive margins: incidence, site, factors involved, and time to PSA progression following radical prostatectomy.
Billis A; Watanabe IC; Costa MV; Telles GH; Magna LA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 17619165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
