473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14980593)
1. Surgical options in deep-bite mandibular deficiency with prominent chin - aesthetic considerations.
Mommaerts MY; Shteif M; Hendrickx K; Laster Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 14980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correction of skeletal Class II--anterior deep bite and prominent chin by forced surgical rotation of the mandible.
Mommaerts MY; López-Arcas JM; Schurmans AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 20170993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of soft tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM; Thüer UW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1610-6. PubMed ID: 18634948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consideration of effect of the amount of mandibular setback on the submental region in the planning of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.
Ghassemi M; Hilgers RD; Jamilian A; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Gerressen M; Ghassemi A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 24593896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome.
Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 11298309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal study of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment of Class II malocclusion with deep overbite.
Jäger A; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Luhr HG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 1940537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
Ingervall B; Thüer U; Vuillemin T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 9081988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft tissue changes with combined mandibular setback and advancement genioplasty.
Scheideman GB; Legan HL; Bell WH
J Oral Surg; 1981 Jul; 39(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 6940958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery in class III malocclusion patients according to extent of mandibular setback, vertical skeletal pattern, and genioplasty.
Kim M; Lee DY; Lim YK; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e20-32. PubMed ID: 20416516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
Joss CU; Thüer UW
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 17962316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
