These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14982341)

  • 1. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: a review.
    Wilcox RK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14982341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
    Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effects of vertebroplasty: adjacent vertebral fractures.
    Baroud G; Vant C; Wilcox R
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 17073569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanical effect of vertebroplasty on the adjacent vertebral body: a finite element study.
    Wilcox RK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 May; 220(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 16808072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15(8):1255-64. PubMed ID: 16311752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.
    Berlemann U; Ferguson SJ; Nolte LP; Heini PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Jul; 84(5):748-52. PubMed ID: 12188498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty.
    Steens J; Verdonschot N; Aalsma AM; Hosman AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E419-22. PubMed ID: 17621198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.
    Boger A; Heini P; Windolf M; Schneider E
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17713795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture.
    Tomita S; Kin A; Yazu M; Abe M
    J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 12665956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical assessment of stability in the metastatic spine following percutaneous vertebroplasty: effects of cement distribution patterns and volume.
    Tschirhart CE; Roth SE; Whyne CM
    J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1582-90. PubMed ID: 15958214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Augmentation Material Stiffness on Adjacent Vertebrae after Osteoporotic Vertebroplasty Using Finite Element Analysis with Different Loading Methods.
    Cho AR; Cho SB; Lee JH; Kim KH
    Pain Physician; 2015 Nov; 18(6):E1101-10. PubMed ID: 26606023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.
    Higgins KB; Harten RD; Langrana NA; Reiter MF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1540-7; discussion 1548. PubMed ID: 12865841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty.
    Frankel BM; Monroe T; Wang C
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 17905320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
    Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
    Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of vertebroplasty: a biomechanical perspective.
    Sun K; Liebschner MA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 32(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 14964724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
    Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
    Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prophylactic vertebroplasty may reduce the risk of adjacent intact vertebra from fatigue injury: an ex vivo biomechanical study.
    Chiang CK; Wang YH; Yang CY; Yang BD; Wang JL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 19214094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Shezifi Y; Ohana N; Ben-Arye A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 16567025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study.
    Baroud G; Nemes J; Heini P; Steffen T
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Aug; 12(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 12687437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.