205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14982354)
41. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.
Chiapasco M; Gatti C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in distracted bone: a case report.
Degidi M; Pieri F; Marchetti C; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15214233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):467-71. PubMed ID: 17622014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Part II: histomorphometric analysis.
Nkenke E; Fenner M; Vairaktaris EG; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 16161738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications.
Ganeles J; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():92-102. PubMed ID: 15635949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants: a comparison between TiUnite and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible.
Fröberg KK; Lindh C; Ericsson I
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 17100744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Morphofunctional aspects of dental implants.
Meyer G; Fanghänel J; Proff P
Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 22137145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: a histologic study in monkeys.
Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Motomura Y; Shin K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 9796152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Assal P; Mericske E; Bürgin W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 7615331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Osseous proliferation of the mandible after placement of endosseous implants.
Nakai H; Niimi A; Ueda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 10874808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Tissue regeneration adjacent to titanium implants placed with simultaneous transposition of the inferior dental nerve: a study in dogs.
Kahnberg KE; Henry PJ; Tan AE; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10697946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: therapeutic differential loading.
Weinberg LA
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):302-10. PubMed ID: 12498438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth.
Johnsen SE; Trulsson M
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Mar; 89(3):1478-87. PubMed ID: 12626623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Changes in passive tactile sensibility associated with dental implants following their placement.
El-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Howell PG; Gilthorpe MS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 12705306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Inferior alveolar nerve repositioning in implant dentistry: a preliminary report.
Sethi A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Oct; 15(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 9601247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Analysis of occlusal stresses transmitted to the inferior alveolar nerve by multiple threaded implants.
Sammartino G; Wang HL; Citarella R; Lepore M; Marenzi G
J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1655-61. PubMed ID: 23347345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
