106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14983132)
1. [Dose evaluation of a flat-panel detector system].
Seguchi S; Ishikawa Y; Mizuno S; Saijou T; Nagao T; Nakamura A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Nov; 59(11):1438-43. PubMed ID: 14983132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
Grewal RK; McLean ID
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography.
Koedooder K; Venema HW
Phys Med Biol; 1986 Jun; 31(6):585-600. PubMed ID: 3755830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
Lin PJ
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM-BASED EVALUATION.
Hadjiconstanti AC; Messaris GAT; Thomopoulos KC; Solomou AG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 27664432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
