106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14983132)
21. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy.
Gagne RM; Quinn PW; Jennings RJ
Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 8164575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Patient absorbed dose in coronary angiography determined by the flat panel digital detector X-ray system].
Kitai T; Ogawa T; Sano S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 59(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 12740566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Entrance surface dose during three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Yamaguchi I; Yamagishi M; Abe T; Kobayashi I; Haruyama T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):1361-5. PubMed ID: 18725100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit.
Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Desmet W; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration.
Nicholson RA; Thornton A; Akpan M
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):296-300. PubMed ID: 7735770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Digital flat image detector technique based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon: experimental studies and initial clinical results].
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Feuerbach S
Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10071647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Examination of Dose Reduction Using Image Noise Reduction Technology in Cardiovascular X-ray Systems].
Saijo T; Seguchi S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(6):451-459. PubMed ID: 28637959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
