385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14983492)
1. Potentially advanced malignancies detected by screening for prostate carcinoma after an interval of 4 years.
Postma R; Roobol M; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Cancer; 2004 Mar; 100(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 14983492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years.
Postma R; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Wildhagen MF; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):708-16. PubMed ID: 15648082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening.
Postma R; Schröder FH; van Leenders GJ; Hoedemaeker RF; Vis AN; Roobol MJ; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 17257742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).
Roobol MJ; Kranse R; de Koning HJ; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. PubMed ID: 14972478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of a randomized, population-based study of biennial screening using serum prostate-specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinoma.
Hugosson J; Aus G; Lilja H; Lodding P; Pihl CG
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 15042673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate carcinoma detection and increased prostate-specific antigen levels after 4 years in Dutch and Japanese males who had no evidence of disease at initial screening.
Ito K; Raaijmakers R; Roobol M; Wildhagen M; Yamanaka H; Schröder FH
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 15578715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Features of prostate cancers detected during a prevalence screening round. The Rotterdam experience.
Van der Kwast TH; Postma R; Hoedemaeker RF; van Leenders GJ; Schröder FH
Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():16-20. PubMed ID: 16018827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Correlation between re-biopsy one year after endocrine therapy and long-term prognosis in localized prostate cancer].
Kameoka H; Katayose K; Kumakawa K; Shiraiwa Y; Uchida H; Takahashi Y; Yazaki J; Yamaguchi O
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2005 Jan; 32(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 15675583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.
Schröder FH; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):901-8. PubMed ID: 18262712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologic organ-confined disease: pT2a versus pT2b.
Freedland SJ; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1646-9. PubMed ID: 15073852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate-specific antigen change in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.
Raaijmakers R; Wildhagen MF; Ito K; Pàez A; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 14972481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate-specific antigen velocity and prostate cancer gleason grade and stage.
Pinsky PF; Andriole G; Crawford ED; Chia D; Kramer BS; Grubb R; Greenlee R; Gohagan JK
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(8):1689-95. PubMed ID: 17330856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The early detection of prostate carcinoma with prostate specific antigen: the Washington University experience.
Smith DS; Humphrey PA; Catalona WJ
Cancer; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1852-6. PubMed ID: 9351559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
