These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14983551)
41. At-risk for cancer: genetic discrimination in the workplace. Jacobs LA Oncol Nurs Forum; 1998 Apr; 25(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 9568603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Panel breaks logjam for bill on employees' genetic histories. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 2003 May; ():A21. PubMed ID: 14621704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models. Andrews LB Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(152):221-85. PubMed ID: 16211786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Your genes and privacy. Slaughter LM Science; 2007 May; 316(5826):797. PubMed ID: 17495141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. An analysis of the proposal for population based screening for hereditary hemochromatosis in Massachusetts. LeGraw JM J Biolaw Bus; 2001; 4(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 12751496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Implications of genetic testing: discrimination in life insurance and future directions. Mould A J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):470-87. PubMed ID: 12852320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The influence of "individualism". Dreher C Adm Radiol; 1994 Jun; 13(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 10136525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Recent developments in health law. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: "First major Civil Rights bill of the century" bars misuse of genetic test results. Abiola S J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(4):856-60. PubMed ID: 19094013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Constitutional classifications and the "gay gene". Becker S J Law Health; 2001-2002; 16(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 14650766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Reasons to eschew federal lawmaking and embrace common law approaches to genetic discrimination. Hoke C J Law Health; 2001-2002; 16(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 14650770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination. McLochlin DL John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Policy issues. Political issues in the genome era. Jeffords JM; Daschle T Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5507):1249-51. PubMed ID: 11233448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The social response to genetic conditions: beware of the antidiscrimination law. Epstein RA Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(5):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17848433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008: What clinicians should understand. Clifton JM; VanBeuge SS; Mladenka C; Wosnik KK J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 May; 22(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 20500738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Too much information: fighting against genetic discrimination. Slaughter LM J AHIMA; 2002 May; 73(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 12004542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Essential requirements of the Act: a short history and overview. Jones NL Milbank Q; 1991; 69 Suppl 1-2():25-54. PubMed ID: 1837833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Confidential! Genetics research is prompting calls for new privacy laws--before it's too late. Regalado A Wall St J (East Ed); 2002 Feb; ():R10. PubMed ID: 12542058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]