350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14983858)
1. House of Lords debates assisted dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Apr; (187):7-10. PubMed ID: 14983858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. House of Lords debates assisted dying (again).
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Jul; (189):7-9. PubMed ID: 14983864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reluctant survivor.
Brahams D
New Law J; 1990 May; 140(6454):639-40. PubMed ID: 16041883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House of Lords on care for dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted dying for the terminally ill.
Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords. Select Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 Mar; (206):9-11. PubMed ID: 16830428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rights of the terminally ill patient.
Hodgson J
Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):169-91. PubMed ID: 10164517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. House of Lords' response to end-of-life issues.
Castledine G
Br J Nurs; 1994 Apr 14-27; 3(7):359-60. PubMed ID: 8173296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical dilemmas when patients want assistance in dying.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 8003720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative reflections on the Belgian Euthanasia Act 2002.
Adams M; Nys H
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):353-76. PubMed ID: 16733879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia in the low countries: a comparative analysis of the law regarding euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands.
Nys H
Ethical Perspect; 2002; 9(2-3):73-85. PubMed ID: 15712438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The new Dutch law on euthanasia.
de Haan J
Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12962085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping our readers informed--euthanasia and assisted suicide in The Netherlands.
Kerkhof AJ; Connolly J
Crisis; 2001; 22(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11548812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
Cantor NL; Thomas GC
Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dutch euthanasia: the new government ordered study.
Fenigsen R
Issues Law Med; 2004; 20(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15382748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: safeguarding against the "slippery slope"--The Netherlands versus the United States.
Green K
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2003; 13(2):639-81. PubMed ID: 16437787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. House of Lords, session 1993-94. Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics, Volume I--Report. Part 3 Opinion of the committee. Patient's consent.
Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 8936852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death.
Downie J
Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
Kamisar Y
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Landman WA
S Afr Med J; 1997 Jul; 87(7):866-9. PubMed ID: 9259718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of the "right to die".
Misbin RI
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 8133234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
