BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14984050)

  • 1. Two-body and three-body wear of glass ionomer cements.
    Kunzelmann KH; Bürkle V; Bauer C
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Nov; 13(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 14984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.
    Xie D; Brantley WA; Culbertson BM; Wang G
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11203534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Sep; 10(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11641841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear of an ion-releasing powder/liquid polymer resin in relation to that of glass-ionomer and conventional resin composites.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Peschke A
    Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):171-177. PubMed ID: 32794389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative wear resistance of reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Teo JC; Teoh SH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 11504433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
    Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.
    Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements.
    Forss H; Seppä L; Lappalainen R
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jan; 7(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 1901811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Gao W; Peng D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jun; 133(6):744-51; quiz 769. PubMed ID: 12085859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements.
    Luczaj-Cepowicz E; Marczuk-Kolada G; Zalewska A; Pawińska M; Leszczyńska K
    Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online); 2014 Jan; 68():23-8. PubMed ID: 24491892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
    Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The physical-mechanical performance of the new Ketac Molar Easymix compared to commercially available glass ionomer restoratives.
    Peez R; Frank S
    J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):582-7. PubMed ID: 16581174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early and long-term wear of 'fast-set' conventional glass-ionomer cements.
    van Duinen RN; Kleverlaan CJ; de Gee AJ; Werner A; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):716-20. PubMed ID: 16026667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bonding mechanism of Ketac-Molar Aplicap and Fuji IX GP to enamel and dentin.
    Hosoya Y; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 10388383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin.
    Bonifácio CC; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Dec; 70(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 22149968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.
    Ellakuria J; Triana R; Mínguez N; Soler I; Ibaseta G; Maza J; García-Godoy F
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12686292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Mechanical Properties of Restorative Glass Ionomers Cements.
    Bahammam S; Nathanson D; Fan Y
    Int Dent J; 2022 Dec; 72(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 36031428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.