173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986055)
1. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.
Gryspeerdt SS; Herman MJ; Baekelandt MA; van Holsbeeck BG; Lefere PA
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 14986055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.
Pickhardt PJ; Bakke J; Kuo J; Robbins JB; Lubner MG; del Rio AM; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W623-8. PubMed ID: 25415727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: pilot study.
Li P; Napel S; Acar B; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Beaulieu CF
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2912-23. PubMed ID: 15543800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; Keogan MT; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Raptopoulos V
Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 11870464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
Chen SC; Lu DS; Hecht JR; Kadell BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10063842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography.
Suh JW; Wyatt CL
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography.
Bruzzi JF; Moss AC; Brennan DD; MacMathuna P; Fenlon HM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 12942279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure.
Sosna J; Bar-Ziv J; Libson E; Eligulashvili M; Blachar A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1100. PubMed ID: 18806149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images.
Song Y; Lee H; Kang HC; Shin J; Hong GS; Park SH; Lee J; Shin YG
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():124-136. PubMed ID: 27936413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bowel wall visualisation at CT colonography.
Svensson MH; Svensson E; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2002 Jan; 43(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 11972469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.
Kim JY; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 20711732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated centerline for computed tomography colonography.
Iordanescu G; Summers RM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):1291-301. PubMed ID: 14626304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Degree of colonic distension: intrapatient comparison between CT colonography and CT with water enema.
Revelli M; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Furnari M; Paparo F; Scopelliti L; Rosenberg I; Rollandi GA
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 27133680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing spatial correspondence between the inner colon surfaces from prone and supine CT colonography.
Roth H; McClelland J; Modat M; Boone D; Hu M; Ourselin S; Slabaugh G; Halligan S; Hawkes D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):497-504. PubMed ID: 20879437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
