These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986199)
1. Measurements of cardiac output during constant exercises: comparison of two non-invasive techniques. Tordi N; Mourot L; Matusheski B; Hughson RL Int J Sports Med; 2004 Feb; 25(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 14986199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output. Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements]. Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output during exercise by inductance cardiography. Kaplan V; Bucklar GB; Bloch KE Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 12750583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The measurement of cardiac output in dogs by impedance cardiography with different electrode arrangements. Adamicza A; Tutsek L; Daróczy B; Bari F; Nagy S Acta Physiol Hung; 1994; 82(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 7976395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation: inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography. Osbak PS; Henriksen JH; Kofoed KF; Jensen GB Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Jul; 71(4):304-13. PubMed ID: 21391778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone. Horstmann E; Könn B Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution. Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impedance cardiography: a potential monitor for hemodialysis. Wynne JL; Ovadje LO; Akridge CM; Sheppard SW; Vogel RL; Van de Water JM J Surg Res; 2006 Jun; 133(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16631198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating changes in cardiac output using an implanted hemodynamic monitor in heart failure patients. Ståhlberg M; Damgaard M; Ersgård D; Norsk P; Karamanoglu M; Linde C; Braunschweig F Scand Cardiovasc J; 2010 Aug; 44(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 20450462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiosurgical ICU patients by noninvasive cardiac output measurements versus pulse contour analysis. Mellert F; Lindner P; Schiller W; Gersing E; Heinze I; Kreuz J; Welz A; Preusse CJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 56(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 18615372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Aesculon cardiac output monitor by subxiphoidal Doppler flow measurement in children with congenital heart defects. Tomaske M; Knirsch W; Kretschmar O; Balmer C; Woitzek K; Schmitz A; Bauersfeld U; Weiss M; Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 May; 26(5):412-5. PubMed ID: 19276980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impedance cardiography: can it replace thermodilution and the pulmonary artery catheter? Stout CL; Van de Water JM; Thompson WM; Bowers EW; Sheppard SW; Tewari AM; Dalton ML Am Surg; 2006 Aug; 72(8):728-32; discussion 733-4. PubMed ID: 16913318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cardiac performance: short- and medium-term variability of impedance cardiography at rest and during dynamic exercise. Sundberg S; Akkila J Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Mar; 34(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 8705093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New method of electrode placement for determination of cardiac output using impedance cardiography. Barde PB; Jindal GD; Singh R; Deepak KK Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2006; 50(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 17193894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery. Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of noninvasive cardiac output measurement using the inert gas rebreathing method in patients with advanced heart failure. Sobański P; Sinkiewicz W; Kubica J; Błazejewski J; Bujak R Cardiol J; 2008; 15(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 18651387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: comparison of the CO2-rebreathing method and electrical impedance cardiography. Bogaard HJ; Hamersma WB; Horsch JL; Woltjer HH; Postmus PE; de Vries PM Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 9413866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output. Zoremba N; Bickenbach J; Krauss B; Rossaint R; Kuhlen R; Schälte G Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1314-9. PubMed ID: 17944633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]