These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986644)
1. Bioethics today, bioethics tomorrow: stem cell research and the "dignitarian alliance". Brownsword R Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):15-51. PubMed ID: 14986644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee. Brownsword R Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK. Sexton S Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning? MacKellar C Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Human biomedicine and the problem of governance. Fukuyama F Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 15834192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. Kass LR New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology. Warnock M Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A house divided. Cohen S Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():12-17, 24-29. PubMed ID: 11647257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How traditions of ethical reasoning and institutional processes shape stem cell research in Britain. Hauskeller C J Med Philos; 2004 Oct; 29(5):509-32. PubMed ID: 15545114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The wisdom of Costa Rica. Mitchell CB Ethics Med; 2005; 21(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 15835086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research on human embryos: issues, politics and solutions. Sharma BR Med Sci Law; 2004 Jan; 44(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 14984213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Thrash it out. New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):3. PubMed ID: 15366155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The President's Council on Bioethics: my take on some of its deliberations. May WF Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 15834195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Embryo ethics--the moral logic of stem-cell research. Sandel MJ N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 15254277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A role for law in matters of morality. McTeer MA McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 11654473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two of a kind--or none? Nicholson R Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):5. PubMed ID: 9219017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The UK model: setting the standard for embryonic stem cell research? Herder M Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 15739306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Europe confronts the embryonic stem cell research challenge. Lenoir N Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5457):1425-7. PubMed ID: 10688780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]