284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986647)
1. Creating clones, kids & chimera: liberal democratic compromise at the crossroads.
Adams NA
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):71-149. PubMed ID: 14986647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating clones, kids & chimera: liberal democratic compromise at the crossroads.
Adams NA
Issues Law Med; 2004; 20(1):3-69. PubMed ID: 15382747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
Robertson JA
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
Kass LR
New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
Robertson JA
Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The constitutionality of regulating human genetic engineering: where procreative liberty and equal opportunity collide.
Attanasio JB
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1986; 53(4):1274-342. PubMed ID: 11655887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human-nonhuman chimeras: a regulatory proposal on the blurring of species lines.
Kopinksi NE
Boston Coll Law Rev; 2004 May; 45(3):619-66. PubMed ID: 16514749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy.
Smith GP
South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
Caulfield T
Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human genetic technology: who shall control?
Blank RH
Cornell J Soc Relat; 1984; 17(2):1-19. PubMed ID: 16100829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Genome Project: bibliography of ethical, social, legal, and scientific aspects.
Arizona State University Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):223-311. PubMed ID: 11659418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The prodigal son: the relationship between patent law and health care.
Bostyn SJ
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 14606473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The politics of bioethics.
Cohen E; Kristol W
Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation.
Krimsky S
Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 16619467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale.
National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada)
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A legal research agenda for the Human Genome Initiative.
Karjala DS
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):121-222. PubMed ID: 11659417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping the human genome and the meaning of monster mythology.
Annas GJ
Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):629-64. PubMed ID: 11653904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
