These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986665)

  • 1. A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Taslitz AE
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():1-79. PubMed ID: 14986665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Barton EF
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Marrus E
    Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High court bars some drug tests.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Mar; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 12159852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women.
    Schroedel JR; Fiber P
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing poor pregnant women for cocaine--physicians as police investigators.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 May; 344(22):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11386286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ferguson v. City of Charleston, S.C.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 186():469-89. PubMed ID: 11868568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prosecution of illicit drug use during pregnancy: Crystal Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Frierson RL; Binkley MW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 11785622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond survival: the procreative rights of women with HIV.
    Boockvar K
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1994; 14(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11652889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feminist theory confronts US Supreme Court rhetoric: the case of abortion rights.
    Binion G
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1997; 11(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16848074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
    Dworkin R
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
    Morris DG
    Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.