These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14986738)
1. The cost effectiveness of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin: a 10-year model of renal transplantation outcomes. Orme ME; Jurewicz WA; Kumar N; McKechnie TL Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(17):1263-76. PubMed ID: 14986738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin in renal transplantation in Italy: cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses. Lazzaro C; McKechnie T; McKenna M J Nephrol; 2002; 15(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 12455727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of sirolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression after renal transplantation in the United Kingdom. McEwan P; Baboolal K; Conway P; Currie CJ Clin Ther; 2005 Nov; 27(11):1834-46. PubMed ID: 16368455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the economic implications of non-adherence and antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients: the role of once-daily tacrolimus in the UK. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2015; 18(12):1050-9. PubMed ID: 26201252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for immunosuppression following renal transplantation in the UK. McEwan P; Dixon S; Baboolal K; Conway P; Currie CJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 16445304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review and economic model of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children. Yao G; Albon E; Adi Y; Milford D; Bayliss S; Ready A; Raftery J; Taylor RS Health Technol Assess; 2006 Dec; 10(49):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-157. PubMed ID: 17134597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-utility analysis of prolonged-release tacrolimus relative to immediate-release tacrolimus and ciclosporin in liver transplant recipients in the UK. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2016 Oct; 19(10):995-1002. PubMed ID: 27172118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results. Krämer BK; Montagnino G; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Krüger B; Ortuño J; Köhler H; Kunzendorf U; Stummvoll HK; Tabernero JM; Mühlbacher F; Rivero M; Arias M; Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20(5):968-73. PubMed ID: 15741208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil. Guerra Júnior AA; Silva GD; Andrade EI; Cherchiglia ML; Costa Jde O; Almeida AM; Acurcio Fde A Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():13. PubMed ID: 25741648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A UK analysis of the cost of switching renal transplant patients from an immediate-release to a prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus based on differences in trough concentration variability. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2014 Jul; 17(7):520-6. PubMed ID: 24754700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model. Jones-Hughes T; Snowsill T; Haasova M; Coelho H; Crathorne L; Cooper C; Mujica-Mota R; Peters J; Varley-Campbell J; Huxley N; Moore J; Allwood M; Lowe J; Hyde C; Hoyle M; Bond M; Anderson R Health Technol Assess; 2016 Aug; 20(62):1-594. PubMed ID: 27578428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin microemulsion in primary SPK transplantation: 3-year results of the Euro-SPK 001 trial. Saudek F; Malaise J; Boucek P; Adamec M; Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20 Suppl 2():ii3-10, ii62. PubMed ID: 15814547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation. Haasova M; Snowsill T; Jones-Hughes T; Crathorne L; Cooper C; Varley-Campbell J; Mujica-Mota R; Coelho H; Huxley N; Lowe J; Dudley J; Marks S; Hyde C; Bond M; Anderson R Health Technol Assess; 2016 Aug; 20(61):1-324. PubMed ID: 27557331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin immunosuppression: long-term outcome in renal transplantation. Jurewicz WA Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2003 May; 18 Suppl 1():i7-11. PubMed ID: 12738757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation. Coukell AJ; Plosker GL Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Dec; 14(6):691-708. PubMed ID: 10346420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year posttransplant graft survival in renal-transplant patients with graft function at 6 months receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion within a triple-drug regimen. Irish W; Sherrill B; Brennan DC; Lowell J; Schnitzler M Transplantation; 2003 Dec; 76(12):1686-90. PubMed ID: 14688516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation. Scott LJ; McKeage K; Keam SJ; Plosker GL Drugs; 2003; 63(12):1247-97. PubMed ID: 12790696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of a cyclosporin-ketoconazole combination: making renal transplantation affordable in developing countries. Gerntholtz T; Pascoe MD; Botha JF; Halkett J; Kahn D Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 May; 60(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 15083250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]