These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14988338)
1. Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airways pressure, bilevel non-invasive ventilation, and standard treatment in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Crane SD; Elliott MW; Gilligan P; Richards K; Gray AJ Emerg Med J; 2004 Mar; 21(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 14988338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the use of continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the early treatment of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: the 3CPO trial. Gray AJ; Goodacre S; Newby DE; Masson MA; Sampson F; Dixon S; Crane S; Elliott M; Nicholl J; Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jul; 13(33):1-106. PubMed ID: 19615296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, prospective trial of oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Park M; Sangean MC; Volpe Mde S; Feltrim MI; Nozawa E; Leite PF; Passos Amato MB; Lorenzi-Filho G Crit Care Med; 2004 Dec; 32(12):2407-15. PubMed ID: 15599144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. Peter JV; Moran JL; Phillips-Hughes J; Graham P; Bersten AD Lancet; 2006 Apr; 367(9517):1155-63. PubMed ID: 16616558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema. Mehta S; Jay GD; Woolard RH; Hipona RA; Connolly EM; Cimini DM; Drinkwine JH; Hill NS Crit Care Med; 1997 Apr; 25(4):620-8. PubMed ID: 9142026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous positive airway pressure versus bilevel noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized multicenter trial. Moritz F; Brousse B; Gellée B; Chajara A; L'Her E; Hellot MF; Bénichou J Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):666-75, 675.e1. PubMed ID: 17764785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Berbenetz N; Wang Y; Brown J; Godfrey C; Ahmad M; Vital FM; Lambiase P; Banerjee A; Bakhai A; Chong M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD005351. PubMed ID: 30950507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure for acute pulmonary edema. Liesching T; Nelson DL; Cormier KL; Sucov A; Short K; Warburton R; Hill NS J Emerg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 24071031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure device in the emergency care of acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomized pilot study. Moritz F; Benichou J; Vanheste M; Richard JC; Line S; Hellot MF; Bonmarchand G; Muller JM Eur J Emerg Med; 2003 Sep; 10(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 12972896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is noninvasive pressure support ventilation as effective and safe as continuous positive airway pressure in cardiogenic pulmonary oedema? Agarwal R; Aggarwal AN; Gupta D Singapore Med J; 2009 Jun; 50(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 19551313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised trial. Masip J; Betbesé AJ; Páez J; Vecilla F; Cañizares R; Padró J; Paz MA; de Otero J; Ballús J Lancet; 2000 Dec 23-30; 356(9248):2126-32. PubMed ID: 11191538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, or noninvasive bilevel positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Park M; Lorenzi-Filho G; Feltrim MI; Viecili PR; Sangean MC; Volpe M; Leite PF; Mansur AJ Arq Bras Cardiol; 2001 Mar; 76(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 11262572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. Ho KM; Wong K Crit Care; 2006; 10(2):R49. PubMed ID: 16569254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health utility and survival after hospital admission with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Goodacre S; Gray A; Newby D; Dixon S; Masson M; Sampson F; Nicholl J; Elliot M; Crane S; Emerg Med J; 2011 Jun; 28(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 20921019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Agarwal R; Aggarwal AN; Gupta D; Jindal SK Postgrad Med J; 2005 Oct; 81(960):637-43. PubMed ID: 16210459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]