These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14988526)
1. Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5662):1272-3. PubMed ID: 14988526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicology. Academy panel mulls ethics of human pesticide experiments. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):327-9. PubMed ID: 12531989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics. Human health research ethics. Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pesticide testing on humans is ethical, science panel says. Vedantam S Washington Post; 2004 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15022674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pesticide testing. EPA draft rules for human subjects draw fire. Stokstad E Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):232. PubMed ID: 16002591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can pesticide tests on humans ever meet standards for ethics? Begley S Wall St J (East Ed); 2003 Jan; ():B1. PubMed ID: 12653118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Indecision over human pesticide data. Dove A Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Critics claim even babies could be exposed to pesticides in research. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 16320460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicology. House would foil human pesticide studies. Kaiser J Science; 2005 May; 308(5726):1234. PubMed ID: 15919959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical testing: issues and ethics. Mossman KL Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing pesticides in humans: of mice and men divided by ten. Krimsky S; Simoncelli T JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(21):2405-7. PubMed ID: 17551133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Flawed ethics recommendations of the U.S. EPA's human studies review board. Shrader-Frechette K Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Jan; 115(1):A17-8. PubMed ID: 17370367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Agency proposes major expansion of its regulations for human subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Oct; 20(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system. Moreno JD J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI research proposals involving child subjects: concerns hindering research ethics boards from approving them and a checklist to help evaluate them. Shiloff JD; Magwood B; Malisza KL Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 21223616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Agency expands its human subject protections but questions remain. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 17058814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]