75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14989984)
1. [Comment on diagnosis of atypical squamous cells using new the Bethesda system 2001].
Wang Y; Bian ML; Liu J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 14989984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems.
Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: lessons learned from human Papillomavirus DNA testing.
Johnston EI; Logani S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 111(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17506090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applicability of the Bethesda System 2001 to a public health setting.
Prandi S; Beccati D; De Aloysio G; Fulgenzi P; Gabrielli M; Ghirardini C; Rivasi F; Saragoni L; de Bianchi PS; Bucchi L
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 16948127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H).
Simsir A; Ioffe O; Sun P; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Levine PH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 16355376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytopathological pattern of cervical Pap smear according to the Bethesda system in Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
Elhakeem HA; Al-Ghamdi AS; Al-Maghrabi JA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Apr; 26(4):588-92. PubMed ID: 15900366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A follow-up study of atypical squamous cells in gynecologic cytology using conventional papanicolaou smears and liquid-based preparations: the impact of the Bethesda System 2001.
Lee CY; Ng WK
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 17369129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gain of the 3q26 region in cervicovaginal liquid-based pap preparations is associated with squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma.
Caraway NP; Khanna A; Dawlett M; Guo M; Guo N; Lin E; Katz RL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18433848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid prescreen of cervical liquid-based cytology preparations: results of a study in an academic medical center.
Frable WJ; Pedigo MA; Powers CN; Yarrell C; Ortiz B; Clark ME; Ebron T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Aug; 40(8):691-7. PubMed ID: 22807384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolution of equivocal results with the Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV DNA test: a cytologic/histologic review of 191 cases.
Knoepp SM; Kuebler DL; Wilbur DC
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2007 Sep; 16(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 17721319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of ASC-H terminology on the detection of HSILs in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19021201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential expression of cdk inhibitors p16, p21cip1, p27kip1, and cyclin E in cervical cytological smears prepared by the ThinPrep method.
Moore GD; Lear SC; Wills-Frank LA; Martin AW; Snyder JW; Helm CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 15637682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [ASCUS: an update].
Boulanger JC; Sevestre H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jan; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16406731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevaccination distribution of human papillomavirus types in women attending at cervical cancer screening in Belgium.
Arbyn M; Benoy I; Simoens C; Bogers J; Beutels P; Depuydt C
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jan; 18(1):321-30. PubMed ID: 19124515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings.
Rekhi B; Ajit D; Joseph SK; Gawas S; Deodhar KK
Cytojournal; 2010 Aug; 7():15. PubMed ID: 20806086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of duplicate slides on atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion.
Zhang S; Kelly B; Hospodar E; Thibodeaux J; Thomas J; Abreo F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jan; 40(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
