BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14990419)

  • 1. Assessment of demand for prenatal diagnostic testing using willingness to pay.
    Caughey AB; Washington AE; Gildengorin V; Kuppermann M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 14990419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold.
    Harris RA; Washington AE; Nease RF; Kuppermann M
    Lancet; 2004 Jan; 363(9405):276-82. PubMed ID: 14751700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the decision regarding amniocentesis in women at genetic risk because of age 35 years or older.
    Vergani P; Locatelli A; Biffi A; Ciriello E; Zagarella A; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 12224068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty.
    Hawker GA; Wright JG; Glazier RH; Coyte PC; Harvey B; Williams JI; Badley EM
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Dec; 46(12):3331-9. PubMed ID: 12483740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women.
    Caughey AB; Washington AE; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 198(3):333.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18177830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age.
    Nakata N; Wang Y; Bhatt S
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Mar; 30(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 20063323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association between chorionic villus sampling and preeclampsia.
    Grobman WA; Auger M; Shulman LP; Elias S
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Aug; 29(8):800-3. PubMed ID: 19455602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation.
    Sharda S; Phadke SR
    J Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 27(9):550-5. PubMed ID: 17611609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis.
    Benn PA; Egan JF; Fang M; Smith-Bindman R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1255-60. PubMed ID: 15172861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic and state-level differences in prenatal diagnosis and live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in the United States.
    Khoshnood B; Pryde P; Blondel B; Lee KS
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2003 Dec; 51(6):617-27. PubMed ID: 14967994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Awareness and use of prenatal diagnosis among Greek women: a national survey.
    Mavrou A; Metaxotou C; Trichopoulos D
    Prenat Diagn; 1998 Apr; 18(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 9602481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health behaviour modelling for prenatal diagnosis in Australia: a geodemographic framework for health service utilisation and policy development.
    Muggli EE; McCloskey D; Halliday JL
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Sep; 6():109. PubMed ID: 16945156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attitude of women with IVF and spontaneous pregnancies towards prenatal screening.
    Abu-Musa AA; Nassar AH; Usta IM
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Nov; 23(11):2438-43. PubMed ID: 18664471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes of a high-risk group of pregnant Saudi Arabian women to prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies.
    Babay ZA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):522-7. PubMed ID: 16335642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.
    Cederholm M; Haglund B; Axelsson O
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 12699801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should all pregnant patients be offered prenatal diagnosis regardless of age?
    Druzin ML; Chervenak F; McCullough LB; Blatman RN; Neidich JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):615-8. PubMed ID: 8459978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Invasive prenatal diagnosis in the Netherlands, 1991-2000: number of procedures, indications and abnormal results detected].
    Nagel HT; Knegt AC; Kloosterman MD; Wildschut HI; Leschot NJ; Vandenbussche FP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jul; 148(31):1538-43. PubMed ID: 15366724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of genetic counseling on decisions of pregnant women aged 35 years or over regarding amniocentesis in Turkey.
    Ilgin-Ruhi H; Yürür-Kutlay N; Tükün A; Bökesoy I
    Eur J Med Genet; 2005; 48(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15953401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nuchal translucency screening: how do women actually utilize the results?
    Caughey AB; Musci TJ; Belluomini J; Main D; Otto C; Goldberg J
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Feb; 27(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 17152116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors.
    Zite N; Wuellner S; Gilliam M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):794-9. PubMed ID: 15802407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.