252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14990419)
21. The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients' uptake of invasive testing.
Wray AM; Ghidini A; Alvis C; Hodor J; Landy HJ; Poggi SH
Prenat Diagn; 2005 May; 25(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 15906421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures.
Kowalcek I; Mühlhoff A; Bachmann S; Gembruch U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 11851964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for Down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women.
Ryan M; Diack J; Watson V; Smith N
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Dec; 25(13):1206-11. PubMed ID: 16353286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing?
Hoskovec J; Mastrobattista JM; Johnston D; Kerrigan A; Robbins-Furman P; Wicklund CA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18236427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. User charges and utilisation of obstetric services in the National Capital District, Papua New Guinea.
Benjamin AL; Sapak P; Purai JK
Pac Health Dialog; 2001 Mar; 8(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12017833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Female sterilization: can the woman who will seek reversal be identified prospectively?
Taylor PJ; Freedman B; Wonnacott T; Brown S
Clin Reprod Fertil; 1986 Jun; 4(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 3742437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Late first-trimester invasive prenatal diagnosis: results of an international randomized trial.
Philip J; Silver RK; Wilson RD; Thom EA; Zachary JM; Mohide P; Mahoney MJ; Simpson JL; Platt LD; Pergament E; Hershey D; Filkins K; Johnson A; Shulman LP; Bang J; MacGregor S; Smith JR; Shaw D; Wapner RJ; Jackson LG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1164-73. PubMed ID: 15172848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A conceptual explanation of risk-reduction behavior and intervention development.
Cox CL; Sullivan JA; Roghmann KJ
Nurs Res; 1984; 33(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 6563535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in rural Southern China.
He M; Chan V; Baruwa E; Gilbert D; Frick KD; Congdon N
Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):411-6. PubMed ID: 17197026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bedsharing and maternal smoking in a population-based survey of new mothers.
Lahr MB; Rosenberg KD; Lapidus JA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e530-42. PubMed ID: 16199682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
Caughey AB; Hopkins LM; Norton ME
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):612-6. PubMed ID: 16946222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mapping uptake of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome and other chromosome abnormalities across Victoria, Australia.
Muggli EE; Collins VR; Halliday JL
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 46(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 17116053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. History of miscarriage and increased incidence of fetal aneuploidy in subsequent pregnancy.
Bianco K; Caughey AB; Shaffer BL; Davis R; Norton ME
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):1098-102. PubMed ID: 16648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
Shulman LP; Elias S
West J Med; 1993 Sep; 159(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 8236967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis: acceptability of procedure and maternal attachment to pregnancy.
Spencer JW; Cox DN
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 72(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 3173922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A cost-effectiveness analysis of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing.
Heckerling PS; Verp MS
Med Care; 1994 Aug; 32(8):863-80. PubMed ID: 8057700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Knowledge and attitudes towards prenatal diagnostic procedures among pregnant women in Greece.
Kitsiou-Tzeli S; Petridou ET; Karagkiouzis T; Dessypris N; Makrithanasis P; Sifakis S; Kanavakis E
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 20215732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utilization of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling by South Carolina women 35 years of age and older.
Knutson C; Young SR; Wade RV; Best RG
J S C Med Assoc; 1989 Oct; 85(10):463-7. PubMed ID: 2811307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Women's willingness to pay for cancer screening].
Kwak MS; Sung NY; Yang JH; Park EC; Choi K
J Prev Med Public Health; 2006 Jul; 39(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 16910307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Infant morbidity following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.
Cederholm M; Haglund B; Axelsson O
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 15777434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]