These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1091 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14990834)
1. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT. Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT. Jinzaki M; Silverman SG; Tanimoto A; Shinmoto H; Kuribayashi S Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):311; author reply 311-2. PubMed ID: 15618388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT. Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma. Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Park JJ; Kim CK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. Young JR; Margolis D; Sauk S; Pantuck AJ; Sayre J; Raman SS Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):444-53. PubMed ID: 23382290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm. Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion. Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma. Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT. Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma. Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm. Kang HS; Park JJ Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma being surgically excised for presumed kidney carcinoma. Hou W; Xiao H; Liu G; Ji Z Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1037-43. PubMed ID: 25940032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT? Lee Y; Kim JK; Shim W; Sung YS; Cho KS; Shin JH; Kim MH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W305-12. PubMed ID: 26295666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]