174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14990916)
1. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography and ultrasonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with surgicoclinicopathologic correlation.
Sarvanan K; Bapuraj JR; Sharma SC; Radotra BD; Khandelwal N; Suri S
J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Mar; 116(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 11893261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: CT, ultrasound versus physical palpation].
Luo D; Shi M; Xu Z
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1998 Jan; 20(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10921058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of palpation, ultrasound and computed tomography in the valuation of lymphatic neck metastasis].
Cinar U; Yiğit O; Topuz E; Akgül G; Unlü M; Başak M; Celebi I; Dadaş B
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 12122634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients: palpation, computed tomography and low field magnetic resonance imaging compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Atula TS; Varpula MJ; Kurki TJ; Klemi PJ; Grénman R
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 25(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 9283844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Akoğlu E; Dutipek M; Bekiş R; Değirmenci B; Ada E; Güneri A
J Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 34(6):384-94. PubMed ID: 16343398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-operative evaluation of cervical adenopathies in tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Giancarlo T; Palmieri A; Giacomarra V; Russolo M
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(4B):2805-9. PubMed ID: 9713465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [B-image sonography in lymph node staging of the head and neck area. A comparison with palpation, computerized and magnetic resonance tomography].
Quetz JU; Rohr S; Hoffmann P; Wustrow J; Mertens J
HNO; 1991 Feb; 39(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 2032876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerized tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe F; Uhrmeister P
Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1932725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases.
Knappe M; Louw M; Gregor RT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Sep; 126(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 10979122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Regional lymph node metastases in malignant tumors of the head and neck: value of diagnostic procedures].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Jan; 70(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 2025343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomography of metastatic cervical lymph nodes. A clinical, computed tomographic, pathologic correlative study.
Moreau P; Goffart Y; Collignon J
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Oct; 116(10):1190-3. PubMed ID: 2206505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphoscintigraphy for interpretation of changes of cervical lymph node function in patients with oral malignant tumors: comparison of Tc-99m-Re and Tc-99m-HSA-D.
Sato T; Yamaguchi K; Morita Y; Noikura T; Sugihara K; Matsune S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 11027392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative studies of diagnosis with US or CT of the cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer].
Furukawa M; Kaneko M; Mochimatsu I; Sawaki S; Igari H; Tsukuda M
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Apr; 94(4):577-86. PubMed ID: 2061737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in cervical lymph node metastasis].
Wang S; Zhang R; Shu J; Lu Z; Zhu C; Chen X; Ge X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 13(8):352-3. PubMed ID: 12541360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metastases in supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer: assessment with palpation, US, and CT.
van Overhagen H; Brakel K; Heijenbrok MW; van Kasteren JH; van de Moosdijk CN; Roldaan AC; van Gils AP; Hansen BE
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15166326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The node-negative neck: accuracy of clinical intraoperative lymph node assessment for metastatic disease in head and neck cancer.
Finn S; Toner M; Timon C
Laryngoscope; 2002 Apr; 112(4):630-3. PubMed ID: 12150514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
