BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14991496)

  • 21. [The importance of diagnostics in faecal incontinence. Endosonography].
    Buhr HJ; Kroesen AJ
    Chirurg; 2003 Jan; 74(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 12552399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnostic possibilities of anal endosonography in proctology. Part 1].
    Sudoł-Szopińska I; Sarti D; Jakubowski W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2001 Mar; 10(57):191-4. PubMed ID: 11398525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anal endosonography.
    Bartram CI
    Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris); 1992; 28(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 1444185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of anal carcinoma.
    Cotter SE; Grigsby PW; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Malyapa RS; Fleshman JW; Birnbaum EH; Wang X; Abbey E; Tan B; Kodner IJ; Hunt SR; Lowney JK; Mutch MG; Dietz DW; Myerson RJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 16626889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Endoanal ultrasound is of little value in follow-up of anal carcinomas.
    Lund JA; Sundstrom SH; Haaverstad R; Wibe A; Svinsaas M; Myrvold HE
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jun; 47(6):839-42. PubMed ID: 15085443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of pericolonic lymph nodes in patients with colorectal cancer: an in vitro and in vivo study of the efficacy of endosonography.
    Nielsen MB; Qvitzau S; Pedersen JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 8517321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Staging anal cancer: prospective comparison of transanal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Otto SD; Lee L; Buhr HJ; Frericks B; Höcht S; Kroesen AJ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Jul; 13(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 19365694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury.
    Gold DM; Bartram CI; Halligan S; Humphries KN; Kamm MA; Kmiot WA
    Br J Surg; 1999 Mar; 86(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 10201780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography.
    Williams AB; Cheetham MJ; Bartram CI; Halligan S; Kamm MA; Nicholls RJ; Kmiot WA
    Br J Surg; 2000 Dec; 87(12):1674-9. PubMed ID: 11122183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel two-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography technique to assess anismus comparing with three-dimensional echodefecography.
    Murad-Regadas SM; Regadas FS; Barreto RG; Rodrigues LV; de Souza MH
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):872-7. PubMed ID: 19681980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Endosonographic staging of lower intestinal malignancy.
    Schizas AM; Williams AB; Meenan J
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2009; 23(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 19744631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anorectal ultrasound for neoplastic and inflammatory lesions.
    Giovannini M; Ardizzone S
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Feb; 20(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 16473804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen: a potentially useful prognostic marker in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and margin.
    Williams M; Swampillai A; Osborne M; Mawdsley S; Hughes R; Harrison M; Harvey R; Glynne-Jones R;
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(13):2391-8. PubMed ID: 23576077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma: miniprobe sonography versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound in a prospective histopathologically verified study.
    Menzel J; Hoepffner N; Nottberg H; Schulz C; Senninger N; Domschke W
    Endoscopy; 1999 May; 31(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10376454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Local staging of anal and distal colorectal tumors with the magnetic resonance endoscope.
    Kulling D; Feldman DR; Kay CL; Bohning DE; Hoffman BJ; Van Velse AK; Baron PL; Lahr CJ; Hawes RH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Feb; 47(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 9512284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anal endosonography for the study of anal canal anatomy: normal images and sonographic variants.
    Ramírez Rodríguez JM; Palacios Fanlo MJ; Artigas Marco C; Aguilella Diago V; Martínez Díez M
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2001 Jun; 93(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 11482040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transvaginal versus anal endosonography for detecting damage to the anal sphincter.
    Frudinger A; Bartram CI; Kamm MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1435-8. PubMed ID: 9168703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multimode ultrasound imaging of an anal canal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).
    Yang F; Liu F; Wen L
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 May; 28(1):61. PubMed ID: 38801613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Usefulness of anal endosonography in the assessment of fistula-in-ano].
    Bussen D; Sailer M; Wening S; Fuchs KH; Thiede A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Oct; 129(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 15486794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endosonography of the anal sphincter in women of different ages and parity.
    Starck M; Bohe M; Fortling B; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 15685668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.