These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1499194)

  • 1. Femoral head intramedullary stemmed implant. A historical prospective.
    Swanson AB; Colwill JC; de Groot Swanson G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Aug; (281):107-11. PubMed ID: 1499194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The first total hip prostheses in man (1890 - 1960)].
    Fischer LP; Planchamp W; Fischer B; Chauvin F
    Hist Sci Med; 2000; 34(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 11625635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A conical-collared intramedullary stem can improve stress transfer and limit micromotion.
    Mandell JA; Carter DR; Goodman SB; Schurman DJ; Beaupré GS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Aug; 19(7):695-703. PubMed ID: 15288455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cup arthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, and femoral head resurfacing for osteonecrosis.
    Barnes CL; Collins DN; Nelson CL
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1991 Jul; 2(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 10149659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem.
    Malhotra R; Dua A; Kiran EK; Bhan S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load transfer with the Austin Moore cementless hip prosthesis.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Orthop Res; 1993 Mar; 11(2):272-84. PubMed ID: 8483040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cementless implant composition and femoral stress. A finite element analysis.
    Namba RS; Keyak JH; Kim AS; Vu LP; Skinner HB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):261-7. PubMed ID: 9520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hip hemiarthroplasty: from Venable and Bohlman to Moore and Thompson.
    Hernigou P; Quiennec S; Guissou I
    Int Orthop; 2014 Mar; 38(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 24170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue fractures of Thompson prostheses. A clinical and biomechanical study of revision procedures.
    Wood M; Timbs A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):127-33. PubMed ID: 7067242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale, experience, and results of long-stem femoral prosthesis.
    Gustilo RB; Bechtold JE; Giacchetto J; Kyle RF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):159-68. PubMed ID: 2684461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty.
    Morrey BF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):169-75. PubMed ID: 2582666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.