These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14992152)
1. Preference-based approaches to measuring the benefits of perinatal care. Petrou S; Henderson J Birth; 2003 Dec; 30(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 14992152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated? Ungar WJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):641-52. PubMed ID: 21604821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Petrou S Health Econ; 2003 Aug; 12(8):697-702. PubMed ID: 12898666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure. Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: a review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002-4. Scuffham PA; Whitty JA; Mitchell A; Viney R Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 18370565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Revicki DA; Kaplan RM Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):477-87. PubMed ID: 8161982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient preference quality of life measures in dermatology. McCombs K; Chen SC Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17537138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health related utility measurement in rheumatology: an introduction. Bakker CH; Rutten-van Mölken M; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S Patient Educ Couns; 1993 May; 20(2-3):145-52. PubMed ID: 8337191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis. Torrance GW Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S8-20. PubMed ID: 10180342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculating Preference Weights for the Labor and Delivery Index: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Women's Birth Experiences. Gärtner FR; de Bekker-Grob EW; Stiggelbout AM; Rijnders ME; Freeman LM; Middeldorp JM; Bloemenkamp KW; de Miranda E; van den Akker-van Marle ME Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 26409614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Lenert L; Kaplan RM Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9 Suppl):II138-50. PubMed ID: 10982099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures. Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Revicki DA Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 8161981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering. Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature. Brett Hauber A; Fairchild AO; Reed Johnson F Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 23637054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Willingness to pay in the context of an economic evaluation of healthcare programs: theory and practice. Gafni A Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S21-32. PubMed ID: 10180338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Willingness to pay as a measure of the benefits of mental health care. Healey A; Chisholm D J Ment Health Policy Econ; 1999 Jun; 2(2):55-58. PubMed ID: 11967409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health related utility measurement: an introduction. Bakker C; van der Linden S J Rheumatol; 1995 Jun; 22(6):1197-9. PubMed ID: 7674256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]