These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14992497)

  • 1. Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies.
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Brown AM; Ott J; Finch SJ
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():116-27. PubMed ID: 14992497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gordon D; Finch SJ; Nothnagel M; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12446984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
    Gordon D; Ott J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Impacts of SNP genotyping call rate and SNP genotyping error rate on imputation accuracy inHolsteincattle].
    Li Z; He J; Jiang J; G Tait R; Bauck S; Guo W; Wu XL
    Yi Chuan; 2019 Jul; 41(7):644-652. PubMed ID: 31307973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping.
    Fu W; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li R; Lin R; Jin L
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Mar; 10():106. PubMed ID: 19284636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors and linkage disequilibrium interact multiplicatively when computing sample sizes for genetic case-control association studies.
    Gordon D; Levenstien MA; Finch SJ; Ott J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():490-501. PubMed ID: 12603052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
    Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle.
    Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computing power and sample size for case-control association studies with copy number polymorphism: application of mixture-based likelihood ratio test.
    Kim W; Gordon D; Sebat J; Ye KQ; Finch SJ
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3475. PubMed ID: 18941524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between call rate per individual and genotyping accuracy of bovine single-nucleotide polymorphism array using deoxyribonucleic acid of various qualities.
    Sasaki S; Yoshinari K; Uchiyama K; Takeda M; Kojima T
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 30230122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneously correcting for population stratification and for genotyping error in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lin WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2007 Oct; 81(4):726-43. PubMed ID: 17846998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of the power of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing to detect genotyping error.
    Cox DG; Kraft P
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16514241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.
    Kang SJ; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 15812170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using duplicate genotyped data in genetic analyses: testing association and estimating error rates.
    Tintle NL; Gordon D; McMahon FJ; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article4. PubMed ID: 17402919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotyping and inflated type I error rate in genome-wide association case/control studies.
    Sampson JN; Zhao H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():68. PubMed ID: 19236714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High concordance of bovine single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes generated using two independent genotyping strategies.
    Magee DA; Berkowicz EW; Sikora KM; Sweeney T; Kenny DA; Kelly AK; Evans RD; Wickham BW; Bradley DG; Spillane C; MacHugh DE
    Anim Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 20967645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.