BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1045 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994167)

  • 1. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
    Ceydeli A; Freund RM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Upside-down" augmentation mastopexy.
    Migliori F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 21108035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis.
    Eisenberg T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21853404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single stage augmentation mastopexy: a novel technique using autologous dermal graft.
    Karacaoglu E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Dec; 63(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 19887928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation.
    Gruber R; Denkler K; Hvistendahl Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(3):269-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 16733769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the Goes double-skin peri-areolar mastopexy with and without implants: A 14-year experience.
    Hickman DM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Feb; 64(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 20045387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast augmentation and mastopexy using a pectoral muscle loop.
    Auersvald A; Auersvald LA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 21052667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
    Kolker AR; Austen WG; Slavin SA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical implants after skin-sparing mastectomy.
    Salgarello M; Farallo E
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 15710117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial plication in concentric mastopexy.
    Pinsky MA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 16082579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conservative augmentation with periareolar mastopexy reduces complications and treats a variety of breast types: a 5-year retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients.
    Cannon CL; Lindsey JT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 20395815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Ramírez-Macías R; ; ; ; ; ;
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 16404648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty using an inferior dermal pedicle or a central pedicle.
    Cho BC; Yang JD; Baik BS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 18037359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach.
    Momeni A; Padron NT; Föhn M; Bannasch H; Borges J; Ryu SM; Stark GB
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 16237580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.