These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994266)

  • 1. The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Sowerby P; Colombo M; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Mar; 44(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 14994266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition.
    Pascalis O; Hunkin NM; Holdstock JS; Isaac CL; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 15193938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of adults' affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds' visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay.
    Flom R; Johnson S
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):64-85. PubMed ID: 21288254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual recognition memory across contexts.
    Jones EJ; Pascalis O; Eacott MJ; Herbert JS
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jan; 14(1):136-47. PubMed ID: 21159095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term retention in 3.5-month-olds: familiarization time and individual differences in attentional style.
    Courage ML; Howe ML
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Jul; 79(3):271-93. PubMed ID: 11394930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of children's performance on two recognition memory tasks: delayed nonmatch-to-sample versus visual paired-comparison.
    Overman WH; Bachevalier J; Sewell F; Drew J
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 Sep; 26(6):345-57. PubMed ID: 8119484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential rates of visual information processing in full-term and preterm infants.
    Rose SA
    Child Dev; 1983 Oct; 54(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 6354626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related changes in memory reactivation by 1- and 2-year-old human infants.
    Morgan K; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Jan; 48(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 16381032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined effect of context change and retention interval on interference in causality judgments.
    Rosas JM; Javier Vila N; Lugo M; López L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 11296490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: implications for a four-phase attention function.
    Bahrick LE; Pickens JN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Jun; 59(3):343-71. PubMed ID: 7622984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental changes in infants' retention of visual stimuli.
    Rose SA
    Child Dev; 1981 Mar; 52(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 7238147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a time-monitoring deficit influence older adults' delayed retrieval shift during skill acquisition?
    Hertzog C; Touron DR; Hines JC
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):607-24. PubMed ID: 17874958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction of a retention interval in a sustained attention task in rats: effects of a visual distracter and increasing the inter-trial interval.
    Burk JA
    Behav Processes; 2004 Nov; 67(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 15519001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cognitive set depends on the involvement of the ventral and dorsal visual systems].
    Kostandov EA; Durova NS; Cheremushkin EA; Iakovenko IA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2005; 55(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 15895856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of encoding time on retention by infants and young children.
    Morgan K; Hayne H
    Infant Behav Dev; 2006 Dec; 29(4):599-602. PubMed ID: 17138314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related changes in visual recognition memory during infancy and early childhood.
    Morgan K; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Mar; 53(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20945410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults' use of context.
    Paxton JL; Barch DM; Storandt M; Braver TS
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 16953712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different working memory capacity in normal young adults for visual and tactile letter recognition task.
    Bliss I; Hämäläinen H
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Jul; 46(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 15842415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.