187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994296)
1. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages.
McGee KP; Debbins JP; Boskamp EB; Blawat L; Angelos L; King KF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Mar; 19(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14994296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain tumor enhancement in MR imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison of SNR and CNR gain using TSE and GRE techniques.
Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Biswas J; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Aug; 42(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 17620938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla.
Ruan C; Yang SH; Cusi K; Gao F; Clarke GD
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 17507805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - initial experience.
Gutberlet M; Spors B; Grothoff M; Freyhardt P; Schwinge K; Plotkin M; Amthauer H; Noeske R; Felix R
Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 15173972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.
Koktzoglou I; Chung YC; Mani V; Carroll TJ; Morasch MD; Mizsei G; Simonetti OP; Fayad ZA; Li D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 16555260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRI of the lung at 3 Tesla using parallel imaging with 32-receiver channel technology.
Henzler T; Dietrich O; Krissak R; Wichmann T; Lanz T; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO; Fink C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 19711408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems.
Hinton DP; Wald LL; Pitts J; Schmitt F
Invest Radiol; 2003 Jul; 38(7):436-42. PubMed ID: 12821858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved SNR in linear reordered 2D bSSFP imaging using variable flip angles.
Paul D; Zaitsev M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):933-41. PubMed ID: 19286338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.
Martirosian P; Boss A; Deimling M; Kiefer B; Schraml C; Schwenzer NF; Claussen CD; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18097273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.
Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Pope W; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.
Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Tosetti M; d'Alesio V; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Di Costanzo A; Bertolino A; Maggialetti A; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla.
Kramer H; Michaely HJ; Matschl V; Schmitt P; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 17507821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiac MR tagging: optimization of sequence parameters and comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in a volunteer study].
Kramer U; Deshpande V; Fenchel M; Klumpp B; Laub G; Finn JP; Claussen CD; Miller S
Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 16586309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three accelerated pulse sequences for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE).
Weber S; Kronfeld A; Kunz RP; Fiebich M; Horstick G; Kreitner KF; Schreiber WG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):569-79. PubMed ID: 17685447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel imaging with 3D TPI trajectory: SNR and acceleration benefits.
Qian Y; Stenger VA; Boada FE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 27(5):656-63. PubMed ID: 19110392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent.
Nael K; Fenchel M; Krishnam M; Finn JP; Laub G; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 17507810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.
Wieben O; Francois C; Reeder SB
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]