133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994750)
1. [Magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck area].
Aschenbach R; Esser D
HNO; 2004 Jan; 52(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 14994750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Magnetic resonance angiography in the head-neck area].
Aschenbach R; Esser D
Radiologe; 2004 Sep; 44(9):899-910; quiz 911-2. PubMed ID: 15448907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric head and neck lesions: assessment of vascularity by MR digital subtraction angiography.
Chooi WK; Woodhouse N; Coley SC; Griffiths PD
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Aug; 25(7):1251-5. PubMed ID: 15313719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiological imaging - magnetic resonance tomography - digital subtraction angiography].
Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Nov; 93(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 25369167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic resonance angiography--a new procedure for vascular imaging in the area of the head-neck].
Grevers G; Balzer JO; Vogl TJ
Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Mar; 72(3):116-24. PubMed ID: 8471094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [First impressions of the use of "SonoCT trade mark real-time compound imaging" in the head and neck area].
Schade G
Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Oct; 81(10):718-24. PubMed ID: 12397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Goyal M; Nicol J; Gandhi D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15131933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography.
Saloner D
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1034-5. PubMed ID: 12812922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of the head and neck.
Mack MG; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1247-51. PubMed ID: 10460356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Competition between CT Angiography and MR Angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Marsault C
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Apr; 25(4):663-4; author reply 664. PubMed ID: 15090363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.
Cosottini M; Pingitore A; Puglioli M; Michelassi MC; Lupi G; Abbruzzese A; Calabrese R; Lombardi M; Parenti G; Bartolozzi C
Stroke; 2003 Mar; 34(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 12624288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable?].
Aschenbach R; Eger C; Basche S; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 15026949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Noninvasive vascular diagnosis with magnetic resonance angiography].
Cejna M
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):59-64. PubMed ID: 12621844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [State of the art and ways of progress in radiology of the head and neck].
Chiesa A
Radiol Med; 1995 Nov; 90(5):626-8. PubMed ID: 8685437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography for measuring carotid stenosis.
Shu H; Sun J; Hatsukami TS; Balu N; Hippe DS; Liu H; Kohler TR; Zhu W; Yuan C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 28165646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
