133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994750)
21. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The value of MR angiography techniques in the detection of head and neck paragangliomas.
van den Berg R; Schepers A; de Bruïne FT; Liauw L; Mertens BJ; van der Mey AG; van Buchem MA
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15544901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].
Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Pitton M; Requardt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion compared with digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of extradural spinal metastases: a pilot study.
Mazura JC; Karimi S; Pauliah M; Banihashemi MA; Gobin YP; Bilsky MH; Patsalides A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(16):E950-4. PubMed ID: 24827525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. X-ray digital subtraction angiography to magnetic resonance-digital subtraction angiography using three-dimensional TRICKS. Historical perspective and computer simulations: a review.
Mistretta CA; Grist TM
Invest Radiol; 1998 Sep; 33(9):496-505. PubMed ID: 9766033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Giannatempo GM; Marano R; De Matthaeis P; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
J Neuroradiol; 1999 Jun; 26(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 10444932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Head and neck vascular malformations: time-resolved MR projection angiography.
Ziyeh S; Schumacher M; Strecker R; Rössler J; Hochmuth A; Klisch J
Neuroradiology; 2003 Oct; 45(10):681-6. PubMed ID: 12942216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accelerated Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Using Highly Constrained Reconstruction of Sparse Cerebrovascular Data Sets.
Clark Z; Johnson KM; Wu Y; Edjlali M; Mistretta C; Wieben O; Turski P
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jun; 51(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 26488372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
Butz B; Dorenbeck U; Borisch I; Zorger N; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis?
Muhs BE; Gagne P; Wagener J; Baker J; Ortega MR; Adelman MA; Cayne NS; Rockman CB; Maldonado T
Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 16200470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Selection of patients for carotid thromboendarterectomy: the role of magnetic resonance angiography.
Wetzel S; Boos M; Bongartz G; Radü EW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S91-4. PubMed ID: 10608403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the evaluation of head-neck vascular anomalies: a preliminary experience.
Romano A; Tavanti F; Rossi Espagnet MC; Terenzi V; Cassoni A; Suma G; Boellis A; Pierallini A; Valentini V; Bozzao A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140302. PubMed ID: 25410709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: Characterization with time-resolved ultrafast 3D MR angiography.
Goyen M; Ruehm SG; Jagenburg A; Barkhausen J; Kröger K; Debatin JF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Mar; 13(3):458-60. PubMed ID: 11241822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
Young GR; Humphrey PR; Shaw MD; Nixon TE; Smith ET
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 57(12):1466-78. PubMed ID: 7798975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries using a dedicated head and neck coil: image quality and assessment of stenoses.
Fellner C; Strotzer M; Fraunhofer S; Held P; Spies V; Seitz J; Fellner F
Neuroradiology; 1997 Nov; 39(11):763-71. PubMed ID: 9406200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of enlarged images using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography, and conventional angiography.
Heo YC; Lee HK; Yang HJ; Cho JH
J Med Syst; 2014 Dec; 38(12):146. PubMed ID: 25352491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
