275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994881)
1. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns.
Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Durna N; Ceylan I
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14994881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III.
D'Attilio M; Caputi S; Epifania E; Festa F; Tecco S
Cranio; 2005 Jul; 23(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16128357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in Cervical Lordosis and Cervicovertebral Morphology in Different Ages with the Possibility of Estimating Skeletal Maturity.
Lazić E; Glišić B; Stamenković Z; Nedeljković N
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(11-12):662-8. PubMed ID: 26946759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The differences in the chronology and calcification of second molars between angle Class III and Class II occlusions in Japanese children.
Haruki T; Kanomi R; Shimono T
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(6):400-4. PubMed ID: 9466009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of skeletal class in the morphology of cervical vertebrae: A study using cone beam computed tomography.
Aranitasi L; Tarazona B; Zamora N; Gandía JL; Paredes V
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 27513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of mandibular length in subjects with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns using the cervical vertebrae maturation.
Generoso R; Sadoco EC; Armond MC; Gameiro GH
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20339713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
Zheng ZH; Yamaguchi T; Kurihara A; Li HF; Maki K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24033888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
Baik CY; Ververidou M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in growing patients: an observational study on shape and dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns.
Tepedino M; Laurenziello M; Guida L; Montaruli G; Troiano G; Chimenti C; Colonna M; Ciavarella D
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19309. PubMed ID: 31848435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the position and morphology of tongue and hyoid bone in skeletal Class II malocclusion based on cone beam computed tomography.
Chen W; Mou H; Qian Y; Qian L
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):475. PubMed ID: 34579690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do bivariate and multivariate cephalometric analyses lead to different results concerning the skeletal cause of postnormal occlusion?
Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Gedrange T
Funct Orthod; 2005; 22(2):6-8, 10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 16536177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Craniofacial changes in Class III malocclusion as related to skeletal and dental maturation.
Baccetti T; Reyes BC; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):171.e1-171.e12. PubMed ID: 17693366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types.
Miralles R; Hevia R; Contreras L; Carvajal R; Bull R; Manns A
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
