These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14994881)

  • 41. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in Class II, Division 1 and Class II, Division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development.
    Lux CJ; Raeth O; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Jul; 65(4):290-311. PubMed ID: 15289922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kurusu A; Horiuchi M; Soma K
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19852595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study.
    Di Carlo G; Polimeni A; Melsen B; Cattaneo PM
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25237711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Study on the difference of corresponding age at cervical vertebral maturation stages among different skeletal malocclusions].
    Zuo C; Cong C; Wang S; Gu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 50(10):611-4. PubMed ID: 26757630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth.
    Ochoa BK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Feb; 125(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 14765052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [A comparison of skeletal changes between adult and adolescent with skeletal class II malocclusions before and after therapy].
    Zhao JH; Ding Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 42(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 20957019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders.
    Di Giacomo P; Ferrara V; Accivile E; Ferrato G; Polimeni A; Di Paolo C
    Pain Res Manag; 2018; 2018():4286796. PubMed ID: 30410638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical vertebra morphology in different skeletal classes. A three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation.
    Watanabe M; Yamaguchi T; Maki K
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):531-6. PubMed ID: 20482359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ethnic differences in craniofacial and upper spine morphology between European and Asian children with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Oh E; Ahn SJ; Sonnesen L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):502-511. PubMed ID: 31582122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Craniofacial patterns of Japanese adults with various types of malocclusion: a counterpart analysis.
    Oka T; Kawamoto T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1994 Dec; 28(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 8935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in different skeletal malocclusions in relation to age.
    Kiełczykowski M; Perkowski K; Kamiński K; Zadurska M; Czochrowska E
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):711. PubMed ID: 38902685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Cephalometric comparisons of the craniofacial characteristics of Class II 1 malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].
    Ye Q; Zhao ZH; Zhao MY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 16955160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of upper airways measurements in patients with mandibular skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Silva NN; Lacerda RH; Silva AW; Ramos TB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):86-93. PubMed ID: 26560826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.