106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14995897)
1. A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP.
Zhang X; Hood DC
J Vis; 2004 Feb; 4(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 14995897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses.
Hoffmann MB; Straube S; Bach M
J Vis; 2003; 3(6):432-9. PubMed ID: 12901714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
Hoffmann MB; Flechner JJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).
Thie J; Sriram P; Klistorner A; Graham SL
Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 22100835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings.
Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M
Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145.
Shigeto H; Tobimatsu S; Yamamoto T; Kobayashi T; Kato M
J Neurol Sci; 1998 Apr; 156(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 9588856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.
Horn FK; Selle F; Hohberger B; Kremers J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 26553198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual evoked electrical and magnetic response to half-field stimulation using pattern reversal stimulation.
Harding GF; Armstrong RA; Janday B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Apr; 12(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 1408167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of the visual evoked magnetic field with the m-sequence technique.
Tabuchi H; Yokoyama T; Shimogawara M; Shiraki K; Nagasaka E; Miki T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2045-54. PubMed ID: 12037017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The early wave of the visual evoked potential to sinusoidal gratings: responses to quadrant stimulation as a function of spatial frequency.
Parker DM; Salzen EA; Lishman JR
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 6175504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: analysis of sectoral waveforms.
Klistorner AI; Graham SL
Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 10947003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multifocal visual evoked potentials--a method study of responses from small sectors of the visual field.
Bengtsson M; Andréasson S; Andersson G
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1975-83. PubMed ID: 15998602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Early latency in pattern-reversal and flash mfVEP].
Unterlauft JD; Meigen T
Ophthalmologe; 2008 Dec; 105(12):1135-41. PubMed ID: 18542967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field.
Yu MZ; Brown B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9135809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse stimuli.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Bui BV
Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 19250600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.
Souza GS; Schakelford HB; Moura AL; Gomes BD; Ventura DF; Fitzgerald ME; Silveira LC
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2012 Oct; 45(10):955-61. PubMed ID: 22782556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording.
Hood DC; Zhang X; Hong JE; Chen CS
Doc Ophthalmol; 2002 May; 104(3):303-20. PubMed ID: 12076018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On determining the intracranial sources of visual evoked potentials from scalp topography: a reply to Kelly et al. (this issue).
Ales JM; Yates JL; Norcia AM
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():703-11. PubMed ID: 22982584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the quality of multifocal visual evoked potential results by calculating multiple virtual channels.
Mazinani BAE; Waberski TD; Weinberger AWA; Walter P; Roessler GF
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jul; 55(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 21674201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
