These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14996341)

  • 1. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview.
    Eva KW; Rosenfeld J; Reiter HI; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2004 Mar; 38(3):314-26. PubMed ID: 14996341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.
    Yoshimura H; Kitazono H; Fujitani S; Machi J; Saiki T; Suzuki Y; Ponnamperuma G
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():75. PubMed ID: 25890189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.
    Eva KW; Macala C
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 24807436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Acad Med; 2004 Jun; 79(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 15165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.
    Yamada T; Sato J; Yoshimura H; Okubo T; Hiraoka E; Shiga T; Kubota T; Fujitani S; Machi J; Ban N
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 28302124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A generalizability study of the medical judgment vignettes interview to assess students' noncognitive attributes for medical school.
    Donnon T; Paolucci EO
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 8():58. PubMed ID: 19077202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews.
    Rosenfeld JM; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 17009095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches.
    Knorr M; Hissbach J
    Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 48(12):1157-75. PubMed ID: 25413910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Wasi P; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19659490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population--a mixed methods study.
    Kelly ME; Dowell J; Husbands A; Newell J; O'Flynn S; Kropmans T; Dunne FP; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 14():267. PubMed ID: 25528046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transition to multiple mini interview (MMI) interviewing for medical school admissions.
    Langer T; Ruiz C; Tsai P; Adams U; Powierza C; Vijay A; Alvarez P; Beck Dallahan G; Rahangdale L
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 9(4):229-235. PubMed ID: 32833134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Trinh K; Wood TJ; Norman GR
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23212501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI.
    Knorr M; Meyer H; Sehner S; Hampe W; Zimmermann S
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jul; 19(1):243. PubMed ID: 31269937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance in attributes assessed by the multiple mini-interview.
    Zaidi NB; Swoboda C; Wang LL; Manuel RS
    Med Teach; 2014 Sep; 36(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 24820377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
    Pau A; Chen YS; Lee VK; Sow CF; De Alwis R
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29874. PubMed ID: 26873337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethinking the Admissions Interview: Piloting Multiple Mini-Interviews in a Graduate Psychology Program.
    Clark JR; Miller CA; Garwood EL
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Oct; 123(5):1869-1886. PubMed ID: 31865837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 19493182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple mini-interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination.
    Cameron AJ; MacKeigan LD; Mitsakakis N; Pugsley JA
    Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 51(4):379-389. PubMed ID: 28118682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.