These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14997998)

  • 21. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.
    Chung K
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(3):83-124. PubMed ID: 15678225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 24699929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The infrared light transmission hearing aid.
    Leshowitz B
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1979; 16(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
    Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative enhancement of speech in noise through a wireless equipped hearing aid.
    Ciorba A; Zattara S; Loroni G; Prosser S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2014 Feb; 34(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 24711683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids.
    Peterson PM; Wei SM; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():85-90. PubMed ID: 2356741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognition and hearing aids.
    Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 19778387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing aids: a review of what's new.
    Kim HH; Barrs DM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16730553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual time-frequency subtraction algorithm for noise reduction in hearing aids.
    Li M; McAllister HG; Black ND; De Pérez TA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Sep; 48(9):979-88. PubMed ID: 11534846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.