267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14998703)
1. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.
Langleben DD; Schroeder L; Maldjian JA; Gur RC; McDonald S; Ragland JD; O'Brien CP; Childress AR
Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 11848716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
Dong G; Wu H
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?
Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 19818837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study of brain mechanisms in error detection during deceptive responses in the normal state and under the influence of alcohol].
Kireev MV; Pakhomov SV; Medvedev SV
Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(2):13-22. PubMed ID: 18472568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions.
Abe N; Suzuki M; Mori E; Itoh M; Fujii T
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17280517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are errors differentiable from deceptive responses when feigning memory impairment? An fMRI study.
Lee TM; Au RK; Liu HL; Ting KH; Huang CM; Chan CC
Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 18938008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying deliberate attempts to fake memory impairment through the combined use of reaction time and event-related potential measures.
van Hooff JC; Sargeant E; Foster JK; Schmand BA
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 19374924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
Guo C; Duan L; Li W; Paller KA
Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task.
Vocat R; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Frishkoff GA
Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 16908058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
